Once again politics come up in the Miss America Pageant.

May 17, 2010 at 4:18 pm | Posted in Anti-Americanism., Illegal Aliens, liberalism, Media bias | 5 Comments

It appears support of the new Arizona anti-illegal alien by Miss Oklahoma cost her the Miss America crown.   Also check out this lie that is in the article. 

“I’m a huge believer in states’ rights. I think that’s what’s so wonderful about America,” Woolard answered of the law which requires state police to stop and question possible undocumented immigrants. “So I think it’s perfectly fine for Arizona to create that law.”

There is nothing in the law that requires police to stop people simply on looks.   

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2010/05/17/2010-05-17_miss_usa_runner_up_miss_oklahoma_morgan_elizabeth_woolard_doomed_by_arizona_immi.html#ixzz0oDhCgOGF

http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2010/05/17/2010-05-17_miss_usa_runner_up_miss_oklahoma_morgan_elizabeth_woolard_doomed_by_arizona_immi.html

Advertisements

5 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. […] Court Nominee With No Judicial Experience Requires Extreme Scrutiny … The rest is here: Once again politics come up in the Miss America Pageant … Share and […]

  2. “There is nothing in the law that requires police to stop people simply on looks.”

    Then define ‘reasonable suspicion’ in the context of this law objectively. In other words, what combination of factors makes it more likely that the person in front of you is here illegaly?

    “It appears support of the new Arizona anti-illegal alien by Miss Oklahoma cost her the Miss America crown.”

    I don’t know if that’s true. However, even if it is, i don’t have a problem with it. Miss America isn’t a democracy, it’s a highly competeded for job. The employer(s) can hire whoever they want or reject whoever they want as long as their reasons aren’t based on legally protected status.

    • Like Eric Holder and Janet Napolitano, you have obviously not read the bill either, otherwise you would not make such a statement. I know liberals(you can’t shake that word as much as you would like to) don’t want to take the time to read a ten page law before lying about it, but you do your side no favors by looking foolish.

      The person who asked the question(a hispanic) was booed by the crowd, during and after he asked the question. He had a political agenda.

      • So? They can still hire whoever they want. And fine, since you seem to invite me to, I will read the bill. Then I will post excerpts herein for your education.

  3. http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2010/05/full-text-arizona-illegal-immigration-law-jan-brewer.html
    Ok, just read the thing. No surprises there. It says exactly what I thought it said.

    20 B. FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW
    21 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW
    22 ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF
    23 THIS STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO
    24 IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, A REASONABLE ATTEMPT SHALL BE
    25 MADE, WHEN PRACTICABLE, TO DETERMINE THE IMMIGRATION STATUS OF THE PERSON,
    26 EXCEPT IF THE DETERMINATION MAY HINDER OR OBSTRUCT AN INVESTIGATION. ANY
    27 PERSON WHO IS ARRESTED SHALL HAVE THE PERSON’S IMMIGRATION STATUS DETERMINED
    28 BEFORE THE PERSON IS RELEASED. THE PERSON’S IMMIGRATION STATUS SHALL BE
    29 VERIFIED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION
    30 1373(c). A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY,
    31 CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE MAY NOT SOLELY
    32 CONSIDER RACE, COLOR OR NATIONAL ORIGIN IN IMPLEMENTING THE REQUIREMENTS OF
    33 THIS SUBSECTION EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY THE UNITED STATES OR
    34 ARIZONA CONSTITUTION. A PERSON IS PRESUMED TO NOT BE AN ALIEN WHO IS
    35 UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES IF THE PERSON PROVIDES TO THE LAW
    36 ENFORCEMENT OFFICER OR AGENCY ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
    37 1. A VALID ARIZONA DRIVER LICENSE.
    38 2. A VALID ARIZONA NONOPERATING IDENTIFICATION LICENSE.
    39 3. A VALID TRIBAL ENROLLMENT CARD OR OTHER FORM OF TRIBAL
    40 IDENTIFICATION.
    41 4. IF THE ENTITY REQUIRES PROOF OF LEGAL PRESENCE IN THE UNITED STATES
    42 BEFORE ISSUANCE, ANY VALID UNITED STATES FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT
    43 ISSUED IDENTIFICATION.

    That is exactly what I have repeatedly said to you, codified into Arizona law. Thank you for wasting my time.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.

%d bloggers like this: